When Metallica Cut Their Hair

In the mid-90s, Metallica stunned their fans worldwide by cutting off their iconic long hair, signaling a significant shift not just in their look but also in their musical direction.

The band Metallica is depicted in a stylized photo with a warm, reddish ambiance. The four members are seated at a table with lit candles, each exuding a cool demeanor in dark sunglasses. They're engaged in various casual poses that give off an air of confident nonchalance, with the setting evoking a moody and atmospheric vibe.
Metallica (1996)
Key Takeaways
  • In the mid-90s, Metallica’s members cut their long hair, signifying a shift in their image and music style​​.
  • The haircut decision was individual, not collective, leading to mixed reactions among fans and media who perceived it as a departure from Metallica’s traditional image​​.
  • Over time, fans accepted the band’s change, focusing more on Metallica’s musical evolution and less on their physical appearance​.

Metallica’s Dramatic Transformation in 1996

In 1996, Metallica’s return with their album “Load” marked a significant turning point in the band’s history, not just musically but also in terms of their physical appearance. The album surprised many fans with its artistic shift from previous albums’ covers, but what stood out even more was the band members’ drastic change in appearance.

Metallica’s shift in 1996 was more than musical; it was a visual transformation that sparked debate among fans.

All members of Metallica had cut their long hair, a move that represented a significant departure from their established metal image. This change was more than just a mere stylistic adjustment; it symbolized a new era for the band. Long hair had been a signature part of their image, resonating with the traditional aesthetics of the metal genre.

This transformation created a point of contention among fans. Some fans viewed the change as a betrayal, accusing the band of selling out. They saw the long hair as an integral part of what made Metallica a symbol of metal music and culture. The haircut, therefore, wasn’t just seen as a change in style but as a shift in identity and ethos.

Individual Choices, Public Perception

During Metallica’s transformative period in the mid-1990s, James Hetfield, the band’s frontman, humorously referred to this era as the “U2 version of Metallica.” This remark highlighted the band’s shift not only in appearance but also in their musical style.

James Hetfield’s reference to Metallica’s “U2 version” encapsulates the band’s stylistic transition during the mid-90s.

Hetfield admitted his discomfort with the band’s overnight image change, including new haircuts, to align with the alternative acts of the day. He noted that both Bob Rock and Lars Ulrich were aiming for a “U2 kind of vibe,” but he couldn’t fully embrace it. Hetfield believed that while image is important, it should authentically reflect the individual.

In a 2016 interview, when asked about what late bassist Cliff Burton might have thought about these drastic changes, Hetfield expressed that Burton would have likely resisted the “Load” and “Reload” era. This reflection underscores the significant shift that the band underwent during this period.

Lars Ulrich, in an interview with WJRR, clarified the misconception about Metallica’s haircut decision. Contrary to popular belief that the band collectively decided to cut their hair, Ulrich explained that each member did so individually over three years. This period of change began with Jason Newsted shaving his head during the Black Album tour at the end of 1993, while ‘Load’ was released in 1996, indicating a gradual change rather than a sudden group decision.

Ulrich highlighted how public perception and the absence of social media at the time contributed to the controversy. Since changes weren’t documented in real-time, the band members’ haircuts, happening at different times, were only widely noticed with ‘Load’s release, creating an impression of a collective, intentional makeover.

The decision to cut their hair was a personal one for each band member, made independently. Ulrich expressed amusement at how fans and the public reacted to these changes. He noted that the controversy was, to some extent, indicative of fans’ deep involvement and passion for the band. Ulrich’s light-hearted approach to the controversy, joking about missing the “glory days” of 1996, shows a relaxed attitude towards a debate that once stirred considerable discussion among fans and critics.

Jason Newsted’s Trendsetting Haircut and Its Impact on Metallica

In the early 1990s, Jason Newsted, Metallica’s bassist, deviated from the long, stereotypical metal hair sported by his bandmates, opting for a unique look with the sides of his head shaved and the top long. This distinct style, known as “the Newsted,” marked a departure from the traditional metal hairstyle of the time.

Jason Newsted’s unconventional haircut set a new trend within Metallica, challenging the stereotypical metal image.

In an interview, Newsted shared that his hairstyle change significantly eased his travel experiences. With his neat haircut, he was able to move through customs effortlessly, a stark contrast to the longer-haired band members who often faced scrutiny and delays. This practical benefit was a key factor in his decision to maintain the hairstyle.

Interestingly, Newsted’s haircut in 1992 preceded the other band members’ decision to cut their hair by several years. He humorously recounted how his streamlined appearance at international borders and improvements in his dating life after the haircut might have influenced James Hetfield and Kirk Hammett to eventually adopt similar hairstyles. This shift in the band’s image, initiated by Newsted, was met with mixed reactions from fans, mirroring the responses to Metallica’s “Load” and “Reload” albums.

Image Overhaul and Fan Reactions

Metallica’s decision to cut their hair in the mid-1990s was met with a mixture of shock, curiosity, and dismay from fans, alongside extensive media coverage. This change symbolized more than just a superficial alteration; it represented a deeper shift in the band’s artistic direction. The announcement of their new hairstyles generated diverse reactions, with some fans expressing intrigue and others feeling a sense of betrayal.

Metallica’s haircut was not just a change in style but a symbol of their evolving artistic direction, eliciting strong reactions from fans and media.

The band’s image transformation extended beyond their haircuts to include changes in their clothing style, signaling a move towards a more refined and contemporary look. This rebranding was perceived as a message of maturity and adaptability, aligning with their evolving musical style. However, this significant shift led some fans to feel a sense of loss for Metallica’s earlier, more rebellious image, interpreting the change as a move towards a more mainstream aesthetic.

The unveiling of Metallica’s new look post-haircut elicited a wide range of responses from their fan base. While many fans embraced the change, viewing it as a natural evolution, others experienced mixed feelings or outright backlash. The negative reactions were fueled by broader cultural factors, including societal expectations and the established norms of the heavy metal genre, which traditionally emphasized long hair and a rebellious attitude. Some purist fans felt that Metallica was abandoning their roots, and media outlets further sensationalized these reactions, framing the haircut as a betrayal of the band’s core fan base.

Despite the initial backlash, as time passed, fans began to process the change and appreciate Metallica’s ongoing commitment to their music. The band’s talent and musical strength helped to bridge the divide, gradually winning over skeptical fans. Over time, the controversy surrounding their haircuts subsided as fans and critics alike refocused on the band’s musical evolution and enduring influence.